□ 34.7ĭS1 and V1 Gen2 ran basically neck and neck here, able to give long range detections every time. Either way, zooming out and looking at the big picture across lots of runs, I think the trend with the DS1 will continue to be clear. I do think that it had some influence with occasionally preventing detectors from getting longer range detections, but that’s the same as every other time I’ve tested here. Traffic was light but present throughout the day. In fact every run with the DS1 was longer than the very best runs with any other detector. A few detectors managed to do it once, but only the DS1 managed to do it every time. It was tough this time and detectors struggled to alert shortly after the red barn. With that said, let’s get into the results. The radar gun was set up in a pretty challenging way, tucked behind some thick foliage.Ĭruise control was locked at 40mph for all the runs, only slowing down to turn around behind the radar car. The full discussion is available here on RDF. Traffic was light, weather was sunny, and temps were 69-75F throughout the day. For that reason I headed back to the red barn course and spent the day running the DS1 against some of the competition, a reduced number of detectors this time so I could 33.8, 34.7, & 35.5. Was its performance a fluke? Does it perform well on all bands? What if it only did well on that last course? Did traffic give the DS1 an unfair win? Are the results repeatable?Įither way, I really wanted to get some more test results in, especially before launch so that we can all have a better understanding of how it performs. So after posting my initial test results with the Radenso DS1 where it did great, people had a bunch of questions and I did too.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |